Desire

Property weighs 7 sub-metrics — atmosphere, location, privacy, parking, luxury, amenities, capacity — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 property score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Underwhelming atmosphere and cramped space.

The property's low scores are a reflection of its dated decor and uncomfortable seating. The cramped space makes it difficult to move around, and the atmosphere feels more like a dingy bar than a high-end club. If you're looking for a luxurious experience, you'll want to keep looking.

Service weighs 7 sub-metrics — door, bar, speed, respect, safety, clean, value — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 service score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Unfriendly door staff and slow service.

The service at Desire is abysmal, with unfriendly door staff and slow bartenders. The lack of respect for customers is evident in the way they're treated like an afterthought. Unless you enjoy being ignored, you'll want to avoid Desire's service.

Food weighs 7 sub-metrics — quality, price, drinks, bottles, luxury, cigar, value — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 food score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Terrible food quality and overpriced drinks.

The food at Desire is a disaster, with overpriced drinks and poor quality cuisine. The menu is limited and uninspired, and the food is often cold or congealed. If you're looking for a decent meal, you'll want to eat elsewhere.

Performers weighs 6 sub-metrics — talent, style, interact, pro, vip, dance — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 performers score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Lackluster performances with too much repetition.

The performers at Desire are lackluster, with too much repetition and not enough variety. The talent quality is subpar, and the appearance style is more like a sad attempt at glamour than a genuine effort to impress. Unless you're a fan of bland, unenthusiastic performances, you'll want to look elsewhere.

Each point on the radar is a dimension scored 0–100, weighted by how much it shapes a night out. Balanced shapes mean well-rounded clubs; spikes mean a venue excels at one thing but not others.

Tap any dimension's own info icon to see which sub-metrics feed into it.

Disappointing experience from top to bottom.

Desire falls short in every department, making it a chore to visit. The low scores across the board indicate a lack of attention to detail and a general disinterest in providing a good experience. Unless you're a die-hard fan of subpar clubs, there's little reason to give Desire a try.

SW Score is a weighted composite across four dimensions — property, service, food, and performers — measured across 27 sub-metrics and a separate value score.

Sub-metric signals are pulled from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. Each dimension rolls up into a 0-100 score, which feeds the weighted overall.

How to read the shape: a balanced radar means a well-rounded club. A spiked shape means it excels at one thing and not others. Tap any dimension below for its full breakdown.