Maximus Gentleman's Club

Property weighs 7 sub-metrics — atmosphere, location, privacy, parking, luxury, amenities, capacity — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 property score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Parking is almost non-existent.

The atmosphere is nice, but it's marred by the complete lack of parking options. You'll be circling the block for a while, and even then, there's no guarantee you'll find a spot. The location is decent, but it's not enough to save this club.

Service weighs 7 sub-metrics — door, bar, speed, respect, safety, clean, value — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 service score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Respectful staff, but service is glacial.

The staff is friendly and respectful, but the service is painfully slow. You'll be waiting a long time for your drinks and food, and even then, they might get it wrong. If you're looking for a place to relax and enjoy some drinks, this isn't it.

Food weighs 7 sub-metrics — quality, price, drinks, bottles, luxury, cigar, value — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 food score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Forgettable eats and drinks.

The food is a sad, forgettable affair. The prices are high, and the quality is low. The drinks are similarly unimpressive, with a limited selection and overpriced bottles. If you're looking for a decent meal or a nice drink, keep looking.

Performers weighs 6 sub-metrics — talent, style, interact, pro, vip, dance — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 performers score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Talented dancers, but mediocre interaction.

The dancers are talented, but the interaction is lacking. They seem disinterested and unengaged, which is a shame because they have some impressive moves. If you're looking for a place to see some high-quality dancers, you might enjoy it here, but don't expect much in terms of interaction.

Each point on the radar is a dimension scored 0–100, weighted by how much it shapes a night out. Balanced shapes mean well-rounded clubs; spikes mean a venue excels at one thing but not others.

Tap any dimension's own info icon to see which sub-metrics feed into it.

Awful all-around, from parking to dancers.

You're better off giving Maximus a wide berth. The low scores across the board are a clear indication that this club is struggling. Overall, it's a forgettable experience, but if you're looking for a place to grab a drink and stare at a dancer, you might find some value here.

SW Score is a weighted composite across four dimensions — property, service, food, and performers — measured across 27 sub-metrics and a separate value score.

Sub-metric signals are pulled from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. Each dimension rolls up into a 0-100 score, which feeds the weighted overall.

How to read the shape: a balanced radar means a well-rounded club. A spiked shape means it excels at one thing and not others. Tap any dimension below for its full breakdown.