Silk

Property weighs 7 sub-metrics — atmosphere, location, privacy, parking, luxury, amenities, capacity — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 property score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

More like a dingy motel room than a club.

The property is a major letdown, with a dingy, cramped atmosphere and a parking lot that's a nightmare. The location is somewhat convenient, but the lack of luxury and amenities makes it feel like a dive bar. If you're looking for a cheap, no-frills spot, this might be your jam.

Service weighs 7 sub-metrics — door, bar, speed, respect, safety, clean, value — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 service score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Horrible service, but friendly door guys.

The service is a mixed bag, with friendly door guys and a decent bar, but slow service and a general air of disorganization. The respect and safety scores are decent, but the speed and cleanliness scores are a major concern. If you're looking for a spot to grab a drink and catch a show, you might be okay, but don't expect much in terms of hospitality.

Food weighs 7 sub-metrics — quality, price, drinks, bottles, luxury, cigar, value — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 food score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Terrible food prices, mediocre quality, and no hookah.

The food and drinks at Silk are a total rip-off, with mediocre quality and outrageous prices. The bottle service is laughable, and the lack of hookah is a major bummer. If you're a foodie or a drink connoisseur, stay far, far away. For everyone else, the food is just a necessary evil.

Performers weighs 6 sub-metrics — talent, style, interact, pro, vip, dance — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 performers score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

The dancers were great, but the overall experience was lacking.

The performers at Silk are the highlight of the club, with talented dancers and a great atmosphere on the floor. However, the professionalism and interaction scores are a major concern, and the overall experience is marred by the poor service and amenities. If you're a fan of adult entertainment, you might find some redeeming qualities here, but be prepared for a subpar experience in every other aspect.

Each point on the radar is a dimension scored 0–100, weighted by how much it shapes a night out. Balanced shapes mean well-rounded clubs; spikes mean a venue excels at one thing but not others.

Tap any dimension's own info icon to see which sub-metrics feed into it.

Total disappointment from start to finish.

Silk is a complete letdown, with nothing standing out. The low overall score is a reflection of the poor quality of nearly every aspect of the club. Don't expect much, and you might leave with a bad taste in your mouth, but a decent memory of the performers.

SW Score is a weighted composite across four dimensions — property, service, food, and performers — measured across 27 sub-metrics and a separate value score.

Sub-metric signals are pulled from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. Each dimension rolls up into a 0-100 score, which feeds the weighted overall.

How to read the shape: a balanced radar means a well-rounded club. A spiked shape means it excels at one thing and not others. Tap any dimension below for its full breakdown.