Sky Lounge

Property weighs 7 sub-metrics — atmosphere, location, privacy, parking, luxury, amenities, capacity — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 property score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Underwhelming luxury

The luxury vibes are undermined by the lack of actual luxury – think cramped space and poor parking. It's clear they're trying to go upscale, but it feels forced and awkward. If you're looking for a high-end experience, keep looking.

Service weighs 7 sub-metrics — door, bar, speed, respect, safety, clean, value — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 service score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Slow and unfriendly service

The service is glacial, with unfriendly staff and a complete lack of respect for customers. The door service is the only mildly tolerable aspect, but even that's not enough to save the club. If you value being treated with dignity, stay away.

Food weighs 7 sub-metrics — quality, price, drinks, bottles, luxury, cigar, value — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 food score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Terrible food and overpriced drinks

The food is an unmitigated disaster – overpriced, underwhelming, and somehow simultaneously both. The drinks aren't much better, with prices that are more suitable for a high-end restaurant. If you're hungry or thirsty, bring your wallet and a strong stomach.

Performers weighs 6 sub-metrics — talent, style, interact, pro, vip, dance — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 performers score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

Average dancers with poor interaction

The performers are average at best, with poor interaction and a complete lack of professionalism. The talent quality is middling, and the appearance style is unremarkable. If you're looking for a memorable experience, the performers won't deliver.

Each point on the radar is a dimension scored 0–100, weighted by how much it shapes a night out. Balanced shapes mean well-rounded clubs; spikes mean a venue excels at one thing but not others.

Tap any dimension's own info icon to see which sub-metrics feed into it.

Disappointing experience all around.

The overall experience is a letdown, with no redeeming qualities standing out. From the subpar performers to the terrible food and drinks, every aspect falls short. Unless you're desperate, it's best to avoid this club altogether.

SW Score is a weighted composite across four dimensions — property, service, food, and performers — measured across 27 sub-metrics and a separate value score.

Sub-metric signals are pulled from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. Each dimension rolls up into a 0-100 score, which feeds the weighted overall.

How to read the shape: a balanced radar means a well-rounded club. A spiked shape means it excels at one thing and not others. Tap any dimension below for its full breakdown.