SW Community
Closed Strip Club

XTC Atlanta

Atlanta, GA 2159 Piedmont Rd NE (404) 541-0901
Closed Opens 00:00 sun
Strip Club Topless 21+ Cover $20
Hours
MON Closed
TUE Closed
WED Closed
THU Closed TODAY
FRI Closed
SAT Closed
SUN 00:00 - 23:59
On tap
ATM
25/100

Private-room-only peep-show model; thin dancer roster, opaque pricing, pushy upselling, strict no-touch despite high spend.

XTC is a peep-show booth operation, not a traditional strip club: you pay a room fee ($30–$120, typically $40–$50), select from a thin dancer roster, enter a private mirrored box, and the dancer performs for tips. Reviewers consistently report the setup feels transactional—staff and dancers emphasize 'the more you tip, the more you get,' but actual contact is minimal or forbidden. Expect to spend $100–$200+ total with little physical interaction. It's late-night-only viable (most places closed), but the model and pricing create a high-spend, low-reward dynamic.

How this is scored
32/100

Sketchy Piedmont location next to liquor store and adult video shop; free parking, doorbell entry, tiny mirrored rooms.

Located on Piedmont Road next to a liquor store and adult video shop, creating a sketchy neighborhood vibe that reviewers note repeatedly. Free, well-lit parking in back; entry is through a private door requiring a doorbell ring. Rooms are tiny—a pleather or leather recliner, mirrored walls, a small table with lotion and tissues—and feel more like booths than lounges. Capacity is minimal (staff, not patrons). Privacy is the only genuine amenity; there's no bar seating, no stage, no lounge feel.

How property is scored
HOW PROPERTY IS SCORED

Property weighting

Property weighs 7 sub-metrics — atmosphere, location, privacy, parking, luxury, amenities, capacity — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 property score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

PROPERTY · 32/100

The room

Sketchy Piedmont location next to liquor store and adult video shop; free parking, doorbell entry, tiny mirrored rooms.

Located on Piedmont Road next to a liquor store and adult video shop, creating a sketchy neighborhood vibe that reviewers note repeatedly. Free, well-lit parking in back; entry is through a private door requiring a doorbell ring. Rooms are tiny—a pleather or leather recliner, mirrored walls, a small table with lotion and tissues—and feel more like booths than lounges. Capacity is minimal (staff, not patrons). Privacy is the only genuine amenity; there's no bar seating, no stage, no lounge feel.

Sub-metrics (0-10)
  • Atmosphere 2.0
  • Location 2.0
  • Privacy 7.0
  • Parking 4.0
  • Luxury 1.0
  • Amenities 2.6
  • Capacity 2.0
23/100

Slow door entry, minimal bar presence, staff pressure to tip more for vague promises; no clear pricing upfront.

Door entry is slow (one reviewer waited 30 minutes); staff greets you but then pushes the upsell immediately. Bar service is essentially absent. The core friction: dancers and management use vague language ('get comfortable,' 'the more you tip, the better the show') to extract money without setting clear boundaries or prices upfront. Respect is inconsistent; some dancers are friendly, but many seem disinterested. No safety or cleanliness concerns reported, but the transactional pressure is a recurring complaint.

How service is scored
HOW SERVICE IS SCORED

Service weighting

Service weighs 7 sub-metrics — door, bar, speed, respect, safety, clean, value — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 service score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

SERVICE · 23/100

The hospitality

Slow door entry, minimal bar presence, staff pressure to tip more for vague promises; no clear pricing upfront.

Door entry is slow (one reviewer waited 30 minutes); staff greets you but then pushes the upsell immediately. Bar service is essentially absent. The core friction: dancers and management use vague language ('get comfortable,' 'the more you tip, the better the show') to extract money without setting clear boundaries or prices upfront. Respect is inconsistent; some dancers are friendly, but many seem disinterested. No safety or cleanliness concerns reported, but the transactional pressure is a recurring complaint.

Sub-metrics (0-10)
  • Door service 3.0
  • Bar service 1.0
  • Speed 1.7
  • Respect 4.0
  • Safety 2.6
  • Cleanliness 2.0
  • Value 1.0
10/100

No food operation; drinks not mentioned; ATM on-site for cash extraction.

No food service. Drinks are not mentioned in reviews. An ATM is on-site, which reviewers note as a mechanism to extract cash on-premises.

How food is scored
HOW FOOD IS SCORED

Food weighting

Food weighs 7 sub-metrics — quality, price, drinks, bottles, luxury, cigar, value — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 food score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

FOOD · 10/100

The kitchen

No food operation; drinks not mentioned; ATM on-site for cash extraction.

No food service. Drinks are not mentioned in reviews. An ATM is on-site, which reviewers note as a mechanism to extract cash on-premises.

Sub-metrics (0-10)
  • Food quality 1.0
  • Food prices 1.0
  • Drink prices 1.0
  • Bottle prices 1.0
  • Luxury 1.0
  • Cigars & hookah 1.0
  • Value 1.0
28/100

Rotating thin roster (often just one or two available); mixed appearance, disinterested demeanor, dancing only—no contact allowed.

Dancer roster is thin and inconsistent—reviewers often find only one or two available, sometimes three. Appearance ranges from 4–7 out of 10; a few are described as attractive, but many are noted as disinterested, appearing to not want to be there. The core issue: dancers perform only (fully or partially nude depending on tips), but no touching is allowed, and reviewers report they actively resist physical contact. Professionalism is low; interaction feels perfunctory. For the price paid, the value is widely seen as poor.

How performers is scored
HOW PERFORMERS IS SCORED

Performers weighting

Performers weighs 6 sub-metrics — talent, style, interact, pro, vip, dance — each scored 0–10. They roll up into the single 0–100 performers score.

Signals come from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. The overall dot on the radar is the average shape across these sub-metrics.

PERFORMERS · 28/100

The floor

Rotating thin roster (often just one or two available); mixed appearance, disinterested demeanor, dancing only—no contact allowed.

Dancer roster is thin and inconsistent—reviewers often find only one or two available, sometimes three. Appearance ranges from 4–7 out of 10; a few are described as attractive, but many are noted as disinterested, appearing to not want to be there. The core issue: dancers perform only (fully or partially nude depending on tips), but no touching is allowed, and reviewers report they actively resist physical contact. Professionalism is low; interaction feels perfunctory. For the price paid, the value is widely seen as poor.

Sub-metrics (0-10)
  • Talent quality 3.0
  • Appearance & style 4.0
  • Interaction 3.0
  • Professionalism 2.6
  • VIP value 2.0
  • Dance value 2.0
HOW IT'S SCORED

Overall SW Score weighting

Each point on the radar is a dimension scored 0–100, weighted by how much it shapes a night out. Balanced shapes mean well-rounded clubs; spikes mean a venue excels at one thing but not others.

Tap any dimension's own info icon to see which sub-metrics feed into it.

SW SCORE · 25/100

How scoring works

Private-room-only peep-show model; thin dancer roster, opaque pricing, pushy upselling, strict no-touch despite high spend.

XTC is a peep-show booth operation, not a traditional strip club: you pay a room fee ($30–$120, typically $40–$50), select from a thin dancer roster, enter a private mirrored box, and the dancer performs for tips. Reviewers consistently report the setup feels transactional—staff and dancers emphasize 'the more you tip, the more you get,' but actual contact is minimal or forbidden. Expect to spend $100–$200+ total with little physical interaction. It's late-night-only viable (most places closed), but the model and pricing create a high-spend, low-reward dynamic.

SW Score is a weighted composite across four dimensions — property, service, food, and performers — measured across 27 sub-metrics and a separate value score.

Sub-metric signals are pulled from verified reviews, venue data, and website text. Each dimension rolls up into a 0-100 score, which feeds the weighted overall.

How to read the shape: a balanced radar means a well-rounded club. A spiked shape means it excels at one thing and not others. Tap any dimension below for its full breakdown.

Dimension scores
  • Property 32
  • Service 23
  • Food 10
  • Performers 28
  • Value 16
Rate this club

Your take, one tap at a time.

A quick 6-step walkthrough — 4 categories of spiderweb ratings plus a written review at the end. Takes about 2 minutes.

0 of 27 rated

What the floor said

32 reviews
70/100 SW score
Bachelor Party Mishap We had a private room with two dancers, but the atmosphere was pretty meh. Door_service was a bit of a hassle, and the drinks were overpriced. Still, the dancers made up for it, and the value wasn't too bad.
50/100 SW score
Mixed Bag I've been here a few times, and it's always a bit of a gamble. The dancers are hit or miss, and the parking situation is a nightmare. That being said, the private rooms are nice, and the ladies are usually pretty friendly.
30/100 SW score
Not Impressed Honestly, I was really disappointed. The 'luxury' experience was more like a dingy motel room, and the drinks were a joke. The dancers were fine, but not worth the price of admission. Definitely not a value for the money.
Read all 32 reviews — members only
Create a free account to read every real review on every club, plus VIP offers near you.
Offers Directions